Search for: "American Can Co. v. City & County of San Francisco" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am

 Visit Legal Technology
 
 Law.com ®
 10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Ray Dowd
Dowd is a partner in the law firm of Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP in New York City. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
" 6 Nathan Dane, General Abridgment and Digest of American Law 226 (Boston, Cummings, Hilliard & Co. 1823). [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am

 Visit Large Law Firm
 Law.com ®
 10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am

 Visit Legal Technology
 
 Law.com ®
 10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
”Ibid.Soon after Amendment 2 was adopted, this litigation to declare its invalidity and enjoin its enforcement was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am by James Hannaway
Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP has experienced employment discrimination and retaliation lawyers in New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, Tennessee, and Baltimore. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:46 pm by Sierra
Clayton County – 2020 | The most recent victory for LGBTQ+ individuals in the United States is the Bostock v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]