Search for: "American Mining Congress v. US Army Corps"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
Regulatory Bulletinhttp://narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2023.html Mining of the Osage Mineral Estate for Oil and Gas (Interior) Final National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures (Commerce) Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2023.html The Army Corps needs an appendectomy: Diagnosing the Army… [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
H.R.5865 - To require the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to protect Native American burial sites, village sites, and cultural resources discovered at Corps of Engineers civil works projects in the Sacramento River watershed, and for other purposes. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
It says the Environmental protection Agency and the Army Corps over-stepped their authority and should have waited for a Supreme Court ruling on the issue. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
In a Texas oil spill case, US v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al., 803 F.3d 31 (D.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
As a correspondent of mine has observed, it is difficult to see how a bi-state commission can continue to operate effectively if one signatory refuses to cooperate and adamantly insists on leaving. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission .. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Similarly, in Hall v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
The contract requires they seek arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Federal Express Corp., No. 07-10555 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
2022 National Defense Strategy On March 28, the Biden administration delivered the classified version of the 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS) to Congress. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
The world, however, will be watching to see whether he also signals a willingness to pressure Congress to enact the law that’s needed to make that happen. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws by failing to give the public enough of a say before issuing permits for mountaintop removal coal mines in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]
