Search for: "American Mining Congress v. US Army Corps" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Regulatory Bulletinhttp://narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2023.html Mining of the Osage Mineral Estate for Oil and Gas (Interior) Final National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures (Commerce) Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2023.html The Army Corps needs an appendectomy: Diagnosing the Army… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
H.R.5865 - To require the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to protect Native American burial sites, village sites, and cultural resources discovered at Corps of Engineers civil works projects in the Sacramento River watershed, and for other purposes. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
It says the Environmental protection Agency and the Army Corps over-stepped their authority and should have waited for a Supreme Court ruling on the issue. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
[Added:] One thing I am certain of, though - while being quite unclear about professional responsibility and military lawyering generally - is that criticism implicit and explicit in the article about scholarly writings by military lawyers is wrong; I thought, for example, that Charles Dunlap's 1990s article about the politicization of the officer corps leading to a coup in the form of a fictitious letter was both an outstanding and unusual piece of scholarship, and an entirely… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  As a correspondent of mine has observed, it is difficult to see how a bi-state commission can continue to operate effectively if one signatory refuses to cooperate and adamantly insists on leaving. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The contract requires they seek arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Federal Express Corp., No. 07-10555 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
2022 National Defense Strategy On March 28, the Biden administration delivered the classified version of the 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS) to Congress. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The world, however, will be watching to see whether he also signals a willingness to pressure Congress to enact the law that’s needed to make that happen. [read post]