Search for: "American Petroleum Institute v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
American Petroleum Institute: As formulated and enforced by this Court, the nondelegation doctrine serves three important functions. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
In my earlier post, I criticized arguments made by former Attorney General William Barr and AEI's Adam White in support of certiorari in American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
As I noted earlier this week, the justices appear to be giving serious consideration to granting certiorari in American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:51 pm
The Supreme Court was scheduled to consider a potentially significant climate-change case at its conference last Friday: American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
American Petroleum Institute, or, as it was described on our syllabus, “the Benzene case. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule[25] requiring facilities that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to report their direct GHG emissions.[26] About 8,000 facilities are required to report.[27] This rule also requires fuel suppliers to report the emissions attributable to the fu [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:19 pm
American Petroleum Institute, a unanimous panel of the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
The case that EPA would not wait for is Sackett v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
American Petroleum Institute, 448 U. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:45 am
American Petroleum Institute, 448 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
American Petroleum Institute, the Supreme Court in 1980 considered whether the Occupational Safety and Health Act violated the nondelegation doctrine by allowing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to adopt limitations for workplace exposure to harmful chemicals. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:08 am
Reg. 24664 (May 30, 2018). [2] American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:43 am
Stakeholders representing the oil industry were also present to testify to the problems they see with the RFS program, including the representatives from the American Petroleum Institute (API), the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), and Valero. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:18 am
Because LDEQ’s hazardous program can be more stringent than EPA’s, until LDEQ amends its rules or otherwise stays enforcement, Legitimacy Factor 4 may remain in place for all recycling (not just under the GCE). __________________________________ [1] American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:27 pm
In American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:20 am
As the Court noted: [The American Petroleum Institute] … proposed precisely the technical infeasibility language EPA adopted in the final rule, suggested that an engineer certify technical infeasibility, and justified its proposed exemption based on a lengthy description of why existing sites were not designed to “handle” EPA’s proposal. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 11:43 am
[ii] The EPA’s decision to add the 1-hour NO2 NAAQS was upheld in American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
A 1948 study conducted by the American Petroleum Institute (API, not exactly the kind of group who is looking to smear the the petrochemical industry) determined that there is no safe quantity of benzene that can be withstood by an average person: “Inasmuch as the body develops no tolerance to benzene, and as there is a wide variation in individual susceptibility, it is generally considered that the only absolutely safe concentration for benzene is zero. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The American Coal Company v. [read post]
