Search for: "Amis v. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
Supporters argued that the theory had roots in Smith itself (specifically its explanation of the earlier Sherbert v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:25 pm
Amy Adler Prof. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:17 am
Citing Smith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked the agency’s lawyer a number of questions about Smith and that lawyer said the agency could win even if Smith were applied. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:36 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
During oral argument, newly-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett pointed out that CSS urged in its briefing that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Amy Robinson and Jim Waldo explained the inherent limitations of contact-tracing apps. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
Smith—a 2017 Supreme Court case in which the Court also sided with the same-sex parents. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
The new Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, whom most people assume is not a friend to the Smith decision, pointedly asked CSS's counsel: [Y]ou argue in your brief that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Smith, the free exercise case that is at stake in Fulton. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
The court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, appeared less enthusiastic about overruling Smith. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:29 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died, and Amy Coney Barrett is now on the court. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
