Search for: "Amis v. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am by Edith Roberts
Sineneng-Smith, a First Amendment challenge to a federal law making it a crime to encourage or induce illegal immigration for financial gain, Liu v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Opati v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Sineneng-Smith “criminalizes a wide range of lawful speech. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Monasky v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Jay J heard the trial in the case of Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Jordan Smith takes a close look at the case at The Intercept. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am by Kalvis Golde
Amy Howe has this blog’s coverage. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe has this blog’s opinion analysis, which first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, in which the court considered when the statute of limitations begins to run for federal civil rights claims based on fabrication of evidence in criminal proceedings. [read post]