Search for: "Amy Salyzyn" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by Patricia Hughes
Amy Salyzyn has discussed whether retired Supreme Court of Canada judges should be allowed to practice in a recent Slaw post that might be helpful for those who are considering commenting on this issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
.; see: (1) “Artificial Intelligence: Will it Help the Delivery of Legal Services but Hurt the Legal Profession”, (Slaw November 21, 2018), and, (2) Suzanne Bouclin, Jena McGill, and Amy Salyzyn, “Mobile and Web-Based Legal Apps: Opportunities, Risks and Information Gaps” (SSRN, June 16, 2017, pdf.). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 3:30 am by Amy Salyzyn
Amy Salyzyn For legal ethics scholars, in-house lawyers are an irresistible and enduring subject of study. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
This post summarizes a full-text article with the same title on the SSRN, and refers to Fasken InHouse. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[See the full text article for this summary on the SSRN, using the same title] Law societies are not trying to solve the A2J problem, but instead provide “alternative legal services”[1] that merely help that majority of the population that cannot afford legal services learn to live with the problem. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Amy Salyzyn wrote about this several years ago in her column Bully Lawyers & Shoplifting Civil Recovery Letters: Who’s Going to Stop Them? [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
On March 23, 2018, I attended a competition among “startup” applications of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to the delivery of legal services. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
(George L Kelling and James Q Wilson, “Broken Windows” The Atlantic, March 1982) Mitt Regan and Amy Salyzyn have also considered this point in relation to law firms that adopt ethical infrastructure, and I have explored it in relation to unethical billing. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
“Apps’” (as used herein, means the application of software to create electronic systems, programs, processes, devices, etc., in relation to legal services) are being developed in many locations. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
The market for personal plight legal services functions poorly, as Malcolm Mercer and Amy Salyzyn have shown in this space. [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:33 pm by Michel-Adrien
" It is possible to open the full-text in PDF format without subscribing to SSRN.The three profs are Suzanne Bouclin, Jena McGill and Amy Salyzyn. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm by Renee Newman Knake
Last this week, Professor Amy Salyzyn published a Jotwell review of my recent essay, The Commercialization of Legal Ethics. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Amy Salyzyn
Amy Salyzyn Previous scholarship has shown us how legal ethics in America has become “federalized” and “privatized. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Gavin MacKenzie, Amy Salyzyn and I participated in August in the Ethics Debate at the Canadian Bar Association Legal Conference. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
Law Societies should be going after the abusive practice of shoplifting demand letters that has been well-documented by my colleague Amy Salyzyn. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
” As explained by Professor Amy Salyzyn, these are the policies, procedures, and workplace culture within a law practice through which lawyers and paralegals fulfil their professional and ethical duties. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:50 am
As usual, my assessment of significance isn’t one I claim to be objective or right; it is better characterized as, “things that happened in 2015 I thought were especially interesting” (with assistance from Richard Devlin, Adam Dodek, and Amy Salyzyn). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
To use Amy Salyzyn’s slaw.ca column title, this is no magic bullet nor is it a mere Band Aid. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by Nate Russell
Much of the whys and wherefores around encryption and Privacy Enhancing Technologies (“PETs”) and their place in legal practice are part of a broader conversation around lawyers’ digital competency — such as what Amy Salyzyn often writes about here on Slaw. [read post]