Search for: "Amy Salyzyn" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
In a recent column, Amy Salyzyn examined some possible threats posed by this system to both privacy and case outcomes. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:22 pm by Patricia Hughes
Amy Salyzyn has discussed the development of remote hearings in her Slaw post here. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
There is no provision in the Model Code that specifically regulates non-adversarial advocacy. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm by Michel-Adrien
Last week on the legal website Slaw.ca, University of Ottawa law professor Amy Salyzyn wrote about the impact of virtual or online court hearings.Well worth a read:"This column considers what our commitment to open courts should look like in a world where virtual hearings are, if not ubiquitous, quite suddenly much more common. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Less harassment of entry-level lawyers might be a positive consequence of abolishing articling, as Amy Salyzyn and others have argued. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:45 pm by Patricia Hughes
Amy Salyzyn describes the advent of the explicit reference to technology in the FLSC Model Code as “a promising development” in a Slaw post. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:30 am by Amy Salyzyn
Amy Salyzyn What should a modern legal service regulator look like? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:51 am by Bob Ambrogi
Writing about this development at the Canadian legal blog Slaw, Amy Salyzyn, a legal ethics expert and associate professor at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Common Law, says, “In many respects, the new language simply makes explicit what is implied in existing rules. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Steve Matthews
Boyle on Dispute Resolution [Slaw archives] Adam Dodek on Legal Education [Slaw archives] John Gregory on Legal Technology [Slaw archives] Patricia Hughes on Justice Issues [Slaw archives] Cameron Hutchison on Legal Ethics [Slaw archives] Ian Mackenzie on Adjudication [Slaw archives] Matt Maurer on Cannabis Law [Slaw archives] National Self-Represented Litigants Project on Access to Justice [Slaw archives] Amy Salyzyn on Legal Ethics [Slaw archives] Noel Semple on Legal Ethics… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Studying Empirical Support for a Functional Literacy Approach 15:1 Journal of Law & Equality 31 (2019) Amy Salyzyn, Associate Professor, Faculty of Common Law, University of OttawaJacquelyn Burkell, Associate Professor, Faculty of Information and Media Studies, Western UniversityEmma Costain, Associate Lawyer, Nelligan O’Brien PayneBrandon Piva, Associate Lawyer, Twining, Short and Haakonson, Barristers Excerpt: Abstract, Part III: The Study (Methodology, Scenarios, Study… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
Research and Resources Developing Privacy Best Practices for Direct-to-Public Legal Apps: Observations and Lessons Learned, (2020) 18:1 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (Forthcoming), Teresa Scassa, University of Ottawa – Common Law Section, Amy Salyzyn, University of Ottawa – Faculty of Law; University of Ottawa – Common Law Section, Jena McGill, University of Ottawa – Common Law Section, Suzanne Bouclin, University of Ottawa – Common… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
On March 20, 2918, I received an email message about Legal Aid Ontario’s (LAO’s) increases in financial eligibility for legal services.[1] But the majority of the taxpayers who fund Legal Aid Ontario, cannot afford legal services for themselves (except for very routine, simple legal services). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
See for example, Amy Salyzyn’s Slaw blog dating back to 2017). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by Patricia Hughes
Amy Salyzyn has discussed whether retired Supreme Court of Canada judges should be allowed to practice in a recent Slaw post that might be helpful for those who are considering commenting on this issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
.; see: (1) “Artificial Intelligence: Will it Help the Delivery of Legal Services but Hurt the Legal Profession”, (Slaw November 21, 2018), and, (2) Suzanne Bouclin, Jena McGill, and Amy Salyzyn, “Mobile and Web-Based Legal Apps: Opportunities, Risks and Information Gaps” (SSRN, June 16, 2017, pdf.). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 3:30 am by Amy Salyzyn
Amy Salyzyn For legal ethics scholars, in-house lawyers are an irresistible and enduring subject of study. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
This post summarizes a full-text article with the same title on the SSRN, and refers to Fasken InHouse. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[See the full text article for this summary on the SSRN, using the same title] Law societies are not trying to solve the A2J problem, but instead provide “alternative legal services”[1] that merely help that majority of the population that cannot afford legal services learn to live with the problem. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Amy Salyzyn wrote about this several years ago in her column Bully Lawyers & Shoplifting Civil Recovery Letters: Who’s Going to Stop Them? [read post]