Search for: "Andersen v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States On 16 June 2014, in the case of Sarah Jones v Dirty World Entertainment [pdf] the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a libel judgment in favour of a former cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals Football Team. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
  The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining that[t]his appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by [Fasteners for Retail] FFR in an unrelated matter in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am by Amy Bray
  He has been asked to provide legal insight into criminal cases that stretch across the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am by Amy Bray
  He has been asked to provide legal insight into criminal cases that stretch across the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013 (Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:16 am by Bexis
Since we follow developments in Canada, and in particular Canadian class action litigation, we thought our readers would like to know about the significant defense win in Andersen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm by Simon Chester
Khalid 2010 ONCA 861 United States of America v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
The covenant itself must only prohibit competitive activity requiring the use of trade secrets. -- Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Opinion Date: 7/1/11 Cite: Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]