Search for: "Andersen v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm by Tom
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Czech Republic Czech Arbitration Court wants to speed up UDRP process (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, Spain bringing 1Mbps broadband to everyone (Ars Technica) Germany More on IPCom and its litigation with HTC in Germany (IAM) India Google Book settlement – Indian government protests... finally (Spicy IP) Cybersquatting gets sharp rap from INDRP Arbitration: Bloomberg finance wins (Spicy IP) Sweden Swedish internet traffic recovers after initial… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
In addition to her contribution to that 1st trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, we noted,Des Forges also gave expert testimony in national courts, the United Nations, the Organization of African Unity, and the national legislatures of Belgium, France, and the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Supreme Court decided Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:09 am
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
” Comcast argued that the memoranda fell within the “derivative privilege” recognized in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]