Search for: "Andersen v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm by jak4
Pinto, “An Overview of United States Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Corporations,” 58 Am. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
Many obituaries will focus on her prodigious and inspiring career in the United States: her journey, from a working-class upbringing in a single-parent family, to practice as a lawyer on child rights and in the Department of Justice, to service, in the District of Columbia Circuit, as the 1st woman Chief Judge of a U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  In this schema, lawyers report directly to nonlawyers, and in cases where the client is someone other than the employer, the attorney owes a duty of loyalty to them both. [31]  Many observers state pragmatically that for all intents and purposes, the MDP revolution has already arrived in relation to corporate practice. [32]  Indeed, by the numbers, Arthur Andersen was the biggest employer of lawyers in the United States in 2000.… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm by Tom
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]