Search for: "Anderson v. Century Products Co." Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
But those statutes are informed by the FDA (heck, many are written by the FDA) and give incredible responsibility to the agency to use its best judgment, so long as the product meets the statutory standards of safety and efficacy. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm by admin
  Over the last quarter century, she has testified from sea to shining sea, for plaintiffs in asbestos, talc, and other litigations.[6] According to J&J, Dr. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
He eschewed the use of epidemiology for discerning the cause of an individual’s disease: “That asbestos is a cause of lung cancer in this practical sense is incontrovertible, but we can never say that asbestos was responsible for the production of the disease in a particular patient, as there are many other etiologically significant agents to which the individual may have been exposed, and we can speak only of the extent to which the risk of the disease was increased by the… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Each product posed unique problems for removal or containment, the cost of which could be determined independently of the costs for dealing with the other products in the building. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
App. 2000) (opinion withdrawn, but its author dissented from the en banc for this reason, 41 S.W.3d at 366-75 [Anderson, J.]). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
Inherent contempt, or the authority of either chamber to punish nonmembers for obstructing its work, including for defiance of its subpoenas—upheld in early Supreme Court decisions (Anderson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
At the University of Chicago where Leiter works, for example, a course on “Jurisprudence” (the philosophy of law) was amongst the small group of courses offered in the year the university’s law school opened more than a century ago. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel… [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm by scottgaille
  The couple would eventually become the parents of James Anderson Elkins—the founder of Vinson & Elkins. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
At that time, it was just me and our two co-founders: Chip and Clint, and a couple of support staff. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:08 am by Jon Gelman
Chris Anderson Roofing Co., 112 N.J.Super. 383, 271 A.2d 451 (Co.1970), aff'd 117 N.J.Super. 497, 285 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1971). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:05 pm by Jon Gelman
Chris Anderson Roofing Co., 112 N.J.Super. 383, 271 A.2d 451 (Co.1970), aff'd 117 N.J.Super. 497, 285 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1971). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
Simpson & Marwick are also known to have represented numerous Scottish local authorities in expensive and long running litigation cases.With connections between the judiciary and law firms now in the news and of a public interest nature, records also show Clyde & Co, who merged with Simpson & Marwick – has among it’s partners a serving judge – Sheriff Peter Anderson.Sheriff Anderson’s biography on the Clyde & Co website states the… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 1979).Since the turn of the century, our team has a definite edge (more on why that is so, below, as well).A few states, like Pennsylvania, and Texas, are somewhere in the middle – allowing a heeding presumption in some product liability situations, but not for cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]