Search for: "Anderson v. Miller" Results 21 - 40 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Tune in to C-SPAN tonight at 6:30 EDT for a conversation about the book, featuring Balleisen, former Congressman Brad Miller, Senior Deputy Attorney General Kevin Anderson, and North Carolina State Historian David Zonderman. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
  Kenneth Anderson flagged Professor Richard Armitage’s topic for this year’s 19th Annual Grotius Lecture at the ASIL Annual Meeting, and he also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Anderson, Sherif Girgis, 67 Cleveland State Law Review 141-172 (2019).Vanita Saleema Snow, Reframing Radical Religion, 11 Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives 1-41 (2019).Brian Miller, Reconciling Religious Freedom and LGBT Rights: The Perils and Promises of Masterpiece Cakeshop, 29 George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 245-274 (2019).Joe Dryden, Matthews v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am by Kenneth Anderson
The first, by reporter Greg Miller, is headlined “U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:53 am by emagraken
Anderson,2009 BCSC 1450 $25,000 no permanent or long-term injury or pain Hsu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:17 am
Bank v Ernst & Young, 285 AD2d 101, 107-108 [2001] no privity between lender and borrower's accountants where only contact was single phone call]; see also Israel Discount Bank of N.Y. v Miller, Ellin & Co., 277 AD2d 58, 59 [2000]). [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
To be obscenity, a work must satisfy all three of the following elements, largely drawn from Miller v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Under this analysis, a professional may be held liable for negligence or malpractice even when they are not retained by plaintiff if a relationship exists between the parties that is so close as to approach privity (see Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 NY2d 417, 425 [I989]). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
Cir. 1993) ("[S]ummary judgment should ‘be refused where the nonmoving party has not had the opportunity to discover information that is essential to [its] opposition.'" (quoting Anderson v. [read post]