Search for: "Anderson v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 4:39 am by Derek Muller
Ross, holding that California may regulate sale of pork products in state even if it may affect interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm by H. Scott Leviant
The question presented is: Does the federal Fair Labor Standard Act's de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:06 pm by Helene Wasserman
Yes, California employment laws are different from the employment laws in many other states. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  For example, both the Fourth and the Ninth Circuits decided as they did with state-mandated agents that were state officers, but let's instead look at California's law. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
  The one case to discuss the Ex Parte Young rule in a copyright context (Richard Anderson Photography v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
(SeaWorld) in the Northern District of California, styled Marc Anderson, et al. v. [read post]