Search for: "Andrea Lusk"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm
This is an unforgivable oversight and we apologize to our faithful readers and especially to our associate Andrea Lusk, who has cranked out our newsletter for the past 8 years. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm
This is an unforgivable oversight and we apologize to our faithful readers and especially to our associate Andrea Lusk, who has cranked out our newsletter for the past 8 years. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:53 pm
Contact Tony Bui, Andrea Lusk or An Nguyen for more details. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
The question in Ontario is whether the Tribunal should be funded through an increase to the monthly common expenses of every condominium unit owner. 3C – Condo Health and Safety: Current Perspectives (featuring GMA’s Andrea Lusk) The Ontario Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”) applies to anyone being paid to work at a condominium. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
The question in Ontario is whether the Tribunal should be funded through an increase to the monthly common expenses of every condominium unit owner. 3C – Condo Health and Safety: Current Perspectives (featuring GMA’s Andrea Lusk) The Ontario Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”) applies to anyone being paid to work at a condominium. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
More ideas will likely flow from an ACMO educational luncheon next week entitled “Condo ConFORMity – coping with the new prescribed forms” featuring GMA associate Andrea Lusk and condo managers Babak Ardalan and Jason Riddle. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
More ideas will likely flow from an ACMO educational luncheon next week entitled “Condo ConFORMity – coping with the new prescribed forms” featuring GMA associate Andrea Lusk and condo managers Babak Ardalan and Jason Riddle. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
John Meringolo Team Members: Michael Chiaramone (2L), Michael Giordano (2L), Samantha Osgood (2L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L)
John Astarita (3L), Peter Garcia (2L), Marissa Koerner (2L), Sarah Lusk (2L) The competition involved a lawsuit by two employees (dancers) seeking compensation and alleging they were employees rather than independent contractors and thus it was unlawful for the owner of the club to charge them money for working in the club. [read post]
