Search for: "Andres v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
Stephens, 574 U.S. 271, 276 (2015) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Argument was held on May 10, 2011 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:40 pm
Clifford and his willingness to create change and look forward to supporting President Elect Obama's efforts to create positive change for the United States at home and around the globe. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:17 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
Pennsylvania State Capitol BuildingHome of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court In the case of Mallory v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Lee, a director since 1994, is also a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, The Procter & Gamble Company and The DIRECTV Group, Inc. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm
Andre, and Scott K. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
Andre and Scott K. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Caroline Fredrickson Look at the name of this panel—it certainly seems to sum up the predicament the United States faces in this perilous moment. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:20 am
Those who do aren’t trying to force anyone else to participate, but the plaintiffs in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:32 am
Andre and Scott K. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of the challenger in Janus v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
He also serves as a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, and DIRECTV. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:51 pm
Today, in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:53 am
On Friday the First Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:18 pm
Notably, the court distinguished a troublesome decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wang v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
In this case (White Hawthorne v. [read post]
