Search for: "Andrew Kent"
Results 201 - 220
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am
Andrew Kent, Fordham School of Law, is publishing The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in volume 91 of the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:12 am
Lobbying “Corporate Lobbyists Funnel Cash to House Democrats Amid Push to Pass Trump’s Business Initiatives” by Andrew Perez (MapLight) and David Sirota for International Business Times Campaign Finance “The $1 Million Upside for an RNC Digital Guru” by Shane Goldmacher for Politico Alabama: “Donors to Former Gov. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:13 am
Council Member Cannot Be Tracked to Source” by Aaron Davis for Washington Post Ethics “With Trump Appointees, a Raft of Potential Conflicts and ‘No Transparency’” by Eric Lipton, Ben Protess, and Andrew Lehren for New York Times Alabama: “Judicial Ethics Complaint Filed Against Judge Who Ordered Halt to Bentley Impeachment Hearing” by Kent Faulk for AL.com California: “Oakland Ethics Panel Slams Lax Oversight of Free Warriors, Raiders… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
Andrew Kent (Fordham University School of Law) has posted The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (91 S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:42 am
My colleague Andrew Kent just uploaded his terrific paper on how the US territories were granted all the criminal procedure rights in the Constitution other than the jury right. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:00 am
He is author most recently of Civil Wars: A History in Ideas (Knopf 2017), which has received high praise and acclaim from reviewers (including Andrew Kent, reviewing it for Lawfare). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:30 am
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, has posted The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, which is forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review 91 (2018):This article contributes to several debates and literatures, which have not previously been all linked together: the history of the jury in the United States, the nature of U.S. imperialism and colonial governance in Puerto Rico and the Philippines, and… [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Andrew Kent offered a guide regarding how we should interpret news that Michael Flynn is seeking immunity from the congressional committees. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm
Additional early commentary comes from Ross Barkan for The Guardian, Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy at The Washington Post, Rick Hasen for his Election Law Blog, Ilya Shapiro and Roger Pilon for Cato at Liberty, Ramesh Ponnuru for National Review, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern for Slate, Kent Scheidegger for his Crime and Consequences blog, Ian Millhiser with two posts for Think Progress, Andrew Prokop for Vox, Charles Pierce for Esquire, Ivan Eland for The… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:49 am
Andrew Kent offered a guide regarding how we should interpret news that Michael Flynn is seeking immunity from the congressional committees. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:32 pm
I see that as I was writing this co-blogger Andrew Kent put up some similar thoughts that are also worth reading. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
Andrew Kent reviewed David Armitage’s book Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:32 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Andrew Kent reviewed David Armitage’s book Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
The murderous terror attack in Westminster this week raised difficult question about journalistic ethics, with a number of newspapers being criticised for publishing pictures of the dead and injured which, it was suggested, were ‘too intrusive. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 3:43 pm
An overview of those cases was presented by attorney Andrew Bucher from Toledo, and a discussion of the most recent decisions in this area was given by lawyer Tim Huey of Columbus. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Editor’s Note: James Andrews contributed to this report. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 am
Jane Chong analyzed reports that White House chief of staff Reince Priebus asked FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and FBI Director James Comey to refute the New York Times’s reporting of links between senior members of the Trump campaign and Russian agents publicly, while Andrew Kent analyzed how we will know whether the Russia-Trump investigations by Congress and the FBI are credible. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:16 pm
Andrew Kent analyzed how we will know whether the Russia-Trump investigations by Congress and the FBI are credible. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
” Andrew Kent, a law professor and constitutional expert at Fordham University is also quoted in the Regulatory Intelligence piece. [read post]
