Search for: "Andrew Kent" Results 41 - 60 of 583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 10:25 am by NELB Staff
Andrew Ingram (Chicago-Kent College of Law) has published "Out of Sight and Out of Mind:Supreme Court Arguments on the Insanity Defense Reveal Criminal Law’s Disguised Moral Culpability Requirement" on SSRN. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:03 pm
The abstract states: Kent Greenawalt claims that one rationale for nonestablishment of... [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:47 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Andrew Ingram (Chicago-Kent College of Law) has posted Out of Sight and Out of Mind:Supreme Court Arguments on the Insanity Defense Reveal Criminal Law’s Disguised Moral Culpability Requirement (University of Richmond Law Review, Forthcoming Volume 56) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, and Julian Davis Mortenson, University of Michigan Law School, have posted The Search for Authorization: Three Eras of the President's National Security Power, which is forthcoming in the Cambridge Companion to the United States Constitution:The constitutional text governing national security law is full of gaps, oversights, and omissions. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, has posted Lessons for Bivens and Qualified Immunity Debates from Nineteenth-Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, which appears in Notre Dame Law Review  96 (2021): 1755-1788:This Essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, has posted The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, which is forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review 91 (2018):This article contributes to several debates and literatures, which have not previously been all linked together: the history of the jury in the United States, the nature of U.S. imperialism and colonial governance in Puerto Rico and the Philippines, and… [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:12 am
Kent Faulk of The Birmingham News reports that "Former SPLC legal director hired to prosecute Roy Moore. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by drodriguez
Andrew Ohanesian, an artist, is the tenant of loft Unit 709, located at 475 Kent Avenue, Brooklyn. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 11:12 am
Contents include:Nadia Banteka, A Theory of Constructive Interpretation for Customary International Law Identification Michael Da Silva, The International Right to Health Care: A Legal and Moral Defense Andrew Kent, Piracy and Due Process Vera Shikhelman, Access to Justice in the United Nations Human Rights Committee [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:42 am by Ethan Leib
My colleague Andrew Kent just uploaded his terrific paper on how the US territories were granted all the criminal procedure rights in the Constitution other than the jury right. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 10:02 am by Max Slater
Kent [opinion, PDF], which held that under existing New York law an individual who views child pornography online does not legally "possess"... [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
But Andrew Kent, Quinta Jurecic and Benjamin Wittes argue in a Lawfare piece published today that there is at least one matter on which Garland's decision-making is ripe for criticism: He is not speaking enough. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am by Christine Corcos
Andrew Kent, Fordham School of Law, is publishing The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in volume 91 of the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am
Andrew Kent, Fordham School of Law, is publishing The Jury and Empire: The Insular Cases and the Anti-Jury Movement in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in volume 91 of the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:16 am by David Sloss
This post responds specifically to Andrew Kent’s skeptical reaction to David Golove’s claim that the judiciary had an active role in policing executive branch compliance with the laws of war. [read post]