Search for: "Andrew Koppelman" Results 161 - 180 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Andrew Koppelman - Northwestern UniversityProf. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
The anti-ADF protests were troubling for a number of reasons well-stated by legal scholar Andrew Koppelman (himself a long-time advocate of same-sex marriage). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
Writing at the New Republic, Andrew Koppelman compares the progression of the health care cases to the 1918 child labor case Hammer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
Dionne in The Washington Post, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, Andrew Koppelman in Salon, Amy Davidson in The New Yorker, and Jeffrey Toobin for The New Yorker. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of Tuesday’s oral arguments in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage comes from David Savage in the Los Angeles Times and Steven Mazie in The Economist (subscription required), while commentary comes from Robert George at Public Discourse, Gene Schaerr at the Daily Signal, Andrew Koppelman and Ilya Somin in an op-ed for USA Today, with a response in a letter to the editor from David Boyle, Steven Mazie at Big Think, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law,… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am by tjsllibrary
James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association Andrew Koppelman; with Tobias Barrington Wolff KF4778 .K67 2009 ThomCat | Sexual Harassment: Prevention, Investigation and Litigation Sound recording State Bar of California AUDIO KFC100.S49 S49 2009 (Lobby Display) ThomCat The South’s Role in the Creation of the Bill of Rights: Essays Jack P. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:40 pm by Jason Mazzone
Andrew Koppelman, writing on this blog, and Orin Kerr, at Volokh Conspiracy, complain that Judge Hudson’s analysis ignores the command of McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
Lash does not accurately describe the work of Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Donald Regan, Robert Stern, and others.  [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
I think we can distinguish between terrorists and freedom fighters, and also that moral criticisms of homosexuality are essentially baseless, for reasons well articulated by scholars like Andrew Koppelman and John Corvino. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At The American Prospect (via How Appealing), Andrew Koppelman notes that “[i]t’s now more than a month since the Supreme Court heard oral argument … on whether federal law prohibits anti-gay discrimination, and suddenly conservatives have focused their attacks on what might seem like an improbable target: Justice Elena Kagan’s insistence on the importance of the plain language of the law. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:40 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Maggie Gallagher, (How) Will Gay Marriage Weaken Marriage as a Social Institution: A Reply to Andrew Koppelman, 2 U. of St. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Three scholars who also fashion ourselves champions of free speech—Professors Andrew Koppelman, Eugene Volokh, and I—take the opposite view. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:59 pm
As it turns out, many of these criticisms was anticipated and addressed in the amicus brief on the sex discrimination argument I coauthored with Northwestern Professor Andrew Koppelman and in our recent USA Today op ed summarizing our argument (the brief may have inspired Roberts’ question). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Among our five favorite comments from yesterday are these: Andrew Koppelman – DOMA is doomed The Supreme Court will probably strike down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which indiscriminately withholds federal recognition from same-sex marriages for all purposes – Social Security, health insurance for federal employees, family benefits for soldiers killed in action. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am by Adam Chandler
Also analyzing the Supreme Court’s possible reaction to the case, Andrew Koppelman has an opinion piece in the L.A. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:54 am by Paul Horwitz
(And there have been responses too, including a forthcoming book by Andrew Koppelman.) [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 3:31 am by SHG
First, it was Northwestern University lawprof Andrew Koppelman, who stated the obvious, that Franks’ and Citron’s anti-revenge laws were obviously unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
As Robert Stern, Donald Regan, Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, and other scholars have concluded, the Committee was embracing, not rejecting, the Resolution’s concern about interstate collective action problems when it provided an enumeration.  [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
  in the longer run, we suspect that [it] will generate few, if any, additional victories for commercial employers seeking to impose the costs of their religious convictions on their employees”; Zoe Henson, who in The New Republic offers the perspective of a woman who uses contraception for medical reasons; Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic, who analyzes what he sees as the underlying reasons for some opposition to the mandate; Andrew Koppelman in The New Republic, who… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
In his Yale Law Journal On-Line essay, Bad News For Mail Robbers: The Obvious Constitutionality of Health Care Reform, Andrew Koppelman cites Balkin’s work and declares that the framers accepted Article I, Section 8 as “the functional equivalent” of Resolution VI. [read post]