Search for: "Andrew Pincus" Results 61 - 80 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Additional coverage comes from Asher Steinberg at The Narrowest Grounds, Alan Morrison at The George Washington Law Review, Andrew Pincus at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Tim Bishop and Chad Clamage at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Deborah LaFetra at Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, and Sharon Rosenberg at Thompson Coburn LLP. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 8:47 am by Andrew Mach
I think he is a judge who believes that the appropriate role is to look at the case in front of him and decide it the best way he can and as narrowly as he can,” said Andrew Pincus, a Washington lawyer who argues regularly at the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
Scalia’s Death Adds To Uncertainty In Class Standing Fight By Allison Grande Law360, New York (February 16, 2016, 10:45 PM ET) — U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
”  At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Andrew Pincus and Archis Parasharami conclude that the impact of the decision “is to make clear that states may not apply idiosyncratic interpretations of contract provisions in order to evade the FAA. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Amber Walsh
It was launched by pharmaceutical industry veterans Don DeGolyer and Andrew Saik in partnership with Warburg Pincus. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Andrew Pincus, Spokeo’s attorney, had barely begun his argument when several Justices took issue with his position that there was no concrete injury. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
Andrew Pincus, arguing for the defendant, asserted that the plaintiff would need to show that something happened to his credit or with an employment opportunity. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
Andrew Pincus, arguing for the defendant, asserted that the plaintiff would need to show that something happened to his credit or with an employment opportunity. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
Andrew Pincus, arguing for the defendant, asserted that the plaintiff would need to show that something happened to his credit or with an employment opportunity. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
”), James Taranto on the Times as “two papers in one,” Andrew Pincus on arbitration as still pretty much the Litigation Lobby’s number one target. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:23 am by Walter Olson
Unveiling a plan to ban the use of arbitration clauses that rule out class actions, the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau behaves as a Plaintiff’s Lawyer Protection Bureau [Andrew Pincus, Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform] More: Boston Globe, Alison Frankel, Reuters. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:11 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" Andrew Pincus (who wrote an amicus brief arguing for exhaustion on behalf of LG, Dell, Google, Intel, etc.) responded: "To be honest, Your Honor, I hadn't thought of that hypothetical," before concluding that there should still be exhaustion. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But, as Andrew Pincus has pointed out, unlike individual would-be litigants, governmental entities cannot  seek federal redress simply for incidental monetary loss, certainly not alleged loss on such a trivial scale. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Wystan Ackerman
Here is part two of my insights from last week’s DRI class action seminar: No Injury Classes and Article III Standing: Andrew Pincus, lead counsel in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:18 pm
"The Next Big Case Challenging Obama's Executive Power": Andrew Pincus has this essay online at TPM Cafe. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:26 pm by Wystan Ackerman
., a member of the Rule 23 Subcommittee to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, regarding the proposed rule changes (see my May 4 blog post for a summary of those) a session by Supreme Court litigator Andrew Pincus on “no injury” classes and Article III standing, which will be the subject of Spokeo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm by Ronald Collins
As to the question of applying strict or “exacting” scrutiny (a point for which Andrew Pincus argued in his merits brief), the Chief Justice could not get four other Justices to lend their name to that portion of his opinion. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
  At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Andrew Pincus and others discuss the grant in Spokeo Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Leon Neyfakh, Slate, via David Henderson] Andrew Pincus on the growing danger of enforcement slush funds [U.S. [read post]