Search for: "Andrew Pincus" Results 101 - 120 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2014, 9:03 am by Rebecca Jeschke
The brief was authored with the assistance of Andrew Pincus of Mayer Brown LLP and the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:52 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the argument for this blog; other coverage and commentary come from Richard Wolf of USA Today, Chanakya Sethi at Slate, and Andrew Pincus at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
John Fund comes from Ken Jost at Jost on Justice and from Andrew Pincus and Archis Parasharami at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:28 pm by Joe Patrice
Panelists include Pamela Harris, Randy Barnett, Joshua Civin, Andrew Pincus, and David Strauss. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Kali Borkoski
Dick Thornburgh will serve as moderator for the event, he will be joined by panelists Andrew Pincus,  Kannon Shanmugam, and Richard Faulk. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
The brief was authored by Andrew Pincus of Mayer Brown LLP and the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by William A. Schreiner, Jr.
Andrew Torrez, is in fact based in a wonderful place called Charm City. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:55 pm by Patent Docs
Shubha Ghosh of the University of Wisconsin Law School, Patent Docs author Kevin Noonan of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, and Andrew Pincus of Mayer Brown LLP will discuss the February 19 oral argument in Bowman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:32 am by Brian Wolfman
Speaking for the [Chamber], attorney Andrew Pincus told CorpCounsel.com, “There is no policy justification for this [proposed rule]. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
To kick off oral argument, Andrew Pincus, appearing as amicus for KeyBank, representing the Chamber of Commerce, was asked by Chief Judge Kozinski if Concepcion is distinguishable because a public injunction is a remedy and not a claim. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On the flip side, in the most difficult moment for the defense, Judge Hurwitz challenged Andrew Pincus about the intersection of arbitration and health and safety concerns. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Brian Wolfman
Recently, we told you about Andrew Pincus's articles defending the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:06 pm by Walter Olson
Maryland delayed foreclosures and is now paying the price in slower housing recovery [Hayley Peterson, Examiner] Andrew Pincus defends arbitration and SCOTUS decision in Concepcion [NYTimes "DealBook"; NLJ] Effort in Florida to ease use of arbitration in med-mal disputes [Miami Herald] Michigan Supreme Court judge Diane Hathaway, elected via 2008? [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:17 am by Allison Zieve
In his piece, Andrew Pincus says that the court system is not actually a good option for consumers because it is slow and costly, and "most legal injuries are too individualized and too small to attract a lawyer’s assistance." [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Writing for the DealBook blog of the New York Times, Andrew Pincus revisits the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:44 am by By ANDREW PINCUS
Companies have reason to be more confident that a fair arbitration system can substitute for judicial litigation, argues Andrew Pincus of the law firm Mayer Brown. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:18 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Philadelphia lawyer James Saksa of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, the Securities Compliance Sentinel Ranting is not Speaking – Public speaking expert Faith Pincus on her blog, Speech Advice California Workers’ Compensation Looms as a Major 2012 Legislative Issue – Irvine lawyer Samuel Sorich of Barger & Wolen on the firm’s Insurance Litigation & Regulatory Law Blog There Are No “Do Over’s” of Divorce Settlements to Recover Madoff Losses – New York lawyer Daniel… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
Mayer Brown's Andrew Pincus, another veteran advocate who was in the audience for most of the three days, said the government had "the harder side of the stick," adding that "the justices asked probing questions, which is what you would expect of an argument of this moment and magnitude. [read post]