Search for: "Andrews v. Lull" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
“State-run retirement plans are the wrong way to protect the poor” [Andrew G. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:32 pm by NCC Staff
Supreme Court finally decided the 2000 election with its Bush v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Andrews, No. 06-30068 Denial of pro se petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as not timely filed is reversed and remanded where: 1) the state did not demonstrate that petitioner should have learned of the existence and relevance of the victim's former employer's testimony with the exercise of due diligence at his trial; and 2) also, a magistrate judge erred in her calculation of the one-year limitations period under the AEDPA. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Jean C. v Andrew B that implicit in the statute is the assumption that it is generally in the best interests of a child to know who her biological father is and not be burdened with one who is not in fact her natural father. [read post]