Search for: "Andrews v. New York State Board of Parole" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 6:03 am by Nabiha Syed
Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic considers the modern era of capital punishment since Gregg v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
That's the title of analysis by Ian Urbina in today's New York Times. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Commentary on the argument came from the editorial boards of the Washington Post and New York Times, both of which urged the Court to find the Act unconstitutional. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees comes from Josh Gerstein of Politico, Ben Kamisar and Lydia Wheeler of The Hill, Andrew Rafferty of NBC News, Robin Bravender for Greenwire, Stephanie Mencimer of Mother Jones, and Ed Kilgore of New York. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The New York Times, Andrew Rosenthal discusses those remarks. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
"Weighing Life in Prison for Youths Who Didn’t Kill," is Adam Liptak's preview from the Sunday New York Times. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by Marissa Miller
Briefly: At New York magazine, Jason Zengerle profiles Paul Clement. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
” Elsewhere in the news the Chicago Tribune’s David Savage and James Vicini of Reuters James Vicini both discuss Astrue v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
  In Britain, murder is punishable by a sentence between some minimum term (after which the murderer could, if he satisfies the Parole Board, be released) and life. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]