Search for: "Andryeyeva v. New York Health Care, Inc."
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 2:05 pm
New York Health Care, Inc. and Moreno v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:07 pm
Health Care, Inc. and Moreno v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:21 pm
New York Health Care, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 6421 (N.Y. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
In this case, Andryeyeva v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in… [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:23 am
Future Care Health Services, Inc., ___ A.D. ___ (2nd Dept. 2017), adopted the First Department’s ruling. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:23 am
Future Care Health Services, Inc., ___ A.D. ___ (2nd Dept. 2017), adopted the First Department’s ruling. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
