Search for: "Anwar v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 2:28 pm
(Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia, supra, pp. 41-42).Anwar had also sought to use the language of religion and corruption against Mahatir, but lost in the end. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:40 am
Unmanned U.S. drone strikes in Yemen killed Anwar and Abdulrahman, both of whom were United States citizens. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:58 am
Ever since the 1936 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Finally, Judge Newman questions the following sentences from page 47 of the government’s appellate brief: Given recent acknowledgments by the President and other senior officials of the previously properly classified fact that the United States carried out the targeted strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, DOJ has now determined that it can provide some limited additional information about classified documents in its possession that are responsive to the ACLU request. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:09 pm
[United Jersey Bank v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
More recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of the defendant in Wood v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
Panetta, a civil suit filed today by the ACLU in an attempt to obtain money damages for airstrikes conducted by the United States in Yemen that resulted in the deaths of three U.S. citizens (Anwar al-Aulaqi, his son, and Samir Khan). [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:36 pm
Citizens v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
One concerns precedent—has the United States ever carried out targeted killings against its own citizens? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
As the Supreme Court ruled in Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
In a case titled United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Therefore, Gul asserted that the United States had lost the authority to detain him at all. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
See Appendix to Br. of the U.S. on the Court’s Lack of Authority To Hear This Case at App. 75-83 (filed Dec. 19, 2013) (Stipulation of Fact, PE 12, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
United States, Respondent. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
Garner and Scott v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
Transparency is the precursor of accountability, so let us keep the ball rolling.Filed under: National Security, Public International Law Tagged: imminence, International law, self-defense, targeted killings, transparency, united states, White Paper [read post]
