Search for: "Apodaca v. Oregon" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Oregon—where the Court had upheld a state non-unanimous criminal verdict—because of the “enormous reliance interests” Apodaca had generated. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:55 am by David Oscar Markus
Wade, also left the justices divided over the issue of respect for their prior precedent.The dispute over nonunanimous jury verdicts dates back almost 50 years, to the court’s 1972 ruling in Apodaca v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am by Amy Howe
The dispute over nonunanimous jury verdicts dates back almost 50 years, to the court’s 1972 ruling in Apodaca v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm by Amy Howe
The first, he explained, is based on the idea that the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the Court had already, in Apodaca v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Appellate courts in Louisiana affirmed the conviction, relying on Apodaca v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:50 am by Michael Gentithes
Louisiana[1] was an unremarkable end to the anachronistic Apodaca v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Believing that Apodaca was a precedent, the courts of Louisiana and Oregon tried thousands of cases under rules allowing conviction by a vote of 11 to 1 or 10 to 2, and appellate courts in those States upheld these convictions based on Apodaca. [read post]