Search for: "Apodaca v. Oregon"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), así como también la determinación en Johnson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Appellate courts in Louisiana affirmed the conviction, relying on Apodaca v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Oregon—where the Court had upheld a state non-unanimous criminal verdict—because of the “enormous reliance interests” Apodaca had generated. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm
Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Florida, in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not require juries to have twelve members, and Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
They would have upheld nonunanimous verdicts because of the past precedent supporting them, the splintered decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:37 am
Louisiana points to a 1972 decision, Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:50 pm
In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am
Oregon. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:48 am
The Court has previously rejected Justice Frankfurter's theory, but as a result of a fractured court in Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Apodaca, 406 U.S. at 409–10 (plurality opinion). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
Welch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
Here's the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
In sharply divided opinions (4-1-4) in Apodaca v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
See Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Nearly 50 years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
’” In light of Timbs, the brief urges the court to revisit its 1972-decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:13 pm
See Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am
One issue dividing justices in Ramos is the treatment of precedent, as the decision overturned Apodaca v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:29 pm
For this reason, I believe that the present Florida system does comply with Ring, given the holding of Apodaca v. [read post]
