Search for: "Appeal Board v. US Steel Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2013, 9:12 am by Administrator
The Alberta Court of Appeal, in a decision reported (2008), 437 A.R. 175; 433 W.A.C. 175, allowed the appeal and referred the question of interest to the board. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
[TTABlog Note: See the CAFC's decision in a companion case (here), holding that the term STEELBUILDING.COM is not generic for Applicant's services, but is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning.]April 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Diamonique Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled eight (8) hearings for the month of November, as listed below. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:09 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Dana Corp), that despite periods of layoff, the term of “employment” continued. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
 410 [hearing deadlines for board of permit appeals]; Gray, supra, 58 Cal.4th 901 [30-day warning period before issuing citations using a newly installed automated traffic enforcement device]; City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
The Court did not resolve the officer’s privacy expectation question, however (June 17, 2010).New Process Steel, LP v NLRB (Dkt No 08-1457). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
See AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office… [read post]