Search for: "Appeal of Hawes" Results 1 - 20 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 8:25 am by Scott Grabel
Now that the Virginia Supreme Court refuses to hear his case, Hawes says that they plan to appeal the conviction to the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:59 am
Thanks to Professor Patty Salkin for posting a summary of the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals decision in Pono v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:40 pm
City and County of Honolulu, No. 28602, which seeks review of the Intermediate Court of Appeals' decision reported at 120 Haw. 457, 209 P.3d 1271 (Haw. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
App. 2008), in which the Intermediate Court of Appeals held that unless the project changes, a supplemental EIS is not required under the Hawaii Environmental Policy Act, Haw. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit says that a district court improperly applied an "identity theft enhancement" when calculating the prison sentence of Bryan Hawes, a rogue investment adviser who had pled guilty to two counts of mail fraud. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:15 pm
Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City and County of Honolulu (No. 27264, May 31, 2007), the Hawaii Supreme Court tackled the issue of when a request for an agency to issue a declaratory ruling under Haw. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
Molokai Ranch, Ltd., No. 28359 (Oct. 21, 2008), held that the State Land Use Law, Haw. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:22 pm by Robert Thomas (
CAAP-11-0000625 (Aug. 24, 2012), the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals held that the Hawaii Senate's failure to confirm a sitting Land Use Commissioner for a second term did not disqualify him under Haw. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Liberty along with Haw have tried to challenge those powers under human rights law, but, after victory in the High Court, ultimately failed to convince the Court of Appeal (see Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006).) [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by David Smith
I should stress here that the issue of whether the protesters could encamp on the pavement is not the issue in this case (or the previous one before the Court of Appeal). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:50 pm by Alasdair Henderson
These protesters were eventually removed following a Court of Appeal ruling in favour of the Mayor of London (who has responsibility for PSG). [read post]