Search for: "Appeal of M.h" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – Fourth District:  In re M.H., 2016 WL 3541185 (2016). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by zshapiro
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a grand jury subpoena against a Fifth Amendment claim for M.H. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:58 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (3): In In Re: The Marriage of K.Z. and M.H., a 6-page opinion, Judge Bailey concludes:Father... [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:46 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (1): M.H. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
    According to the court of appeals opinion, M.H. should have objected at that point to the disposition by a single Board member and sought reconsideration before a panel. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in In re M.H.: In re MH An excerpt: Father is correct that the Act requires that a party seeking to terminate the parental rights of a child that may be Native American must follow specific procedures for notifying the child’s potential tribe about a termination-of-parental-rights hearing. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
According to the Regina Leader-Post, Merchant filed his appeal yesterday. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:35 am
A request seeking permission to delay filing an appeal with the Commissioner of Education must be timely filedM.H. v Santiago Taveras, Interim-Acting Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning of the New York City Department of Education, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 16,097M.H., a tenured New York City teacher, appealed the denial of her objections to unsatisfactory performance ratings by the Interim-Acting Deputy Chancellor to the Commissioner of… [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:57 am
Term. of the Parent/Child Rel. of M.H.1,M.H.2,M.H.3,M.H.4, minor children, and their father Thaddeus Harris v. [read post]