Search for: "Appeal of Ramseur" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2014, 10:40 am by Jamie Markham
Julie Ramseur Lewis & John Rubin, North Carolina Defender Manual (Vol. 2, Trial), at 341. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ramseur demonstrates the extreme danger matrimonial litigants are subjected to in a settlement allocution when they are asked the simple question by the judge: “Are you satisfied with the work of your attorney? [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ramseur provides a detailed analysis of the first two of three elements of legal malpractice: departure from good practice and the proximate cause result of that departure. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  There is plenty of Court of Appeals and Appellate Division law which completely outlaws such an award. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:33 am by Steve Hall
After more than a decade of court appeals, Superior Court Judge Robert C. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:41 am by Taryn Rucinski
Ramseur discusses the following: SummaryAir emissions from outer continental shelf (OCS) operations are subject to different regulatory programs, depending on the location of the operation. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 9:40 am by Steve Hall
The departures leave Ramseur and one other attorney to handle four capital cases, including one in Virginia Beach. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:14 pm by Christopher Tyner
  The Court of Appeals had held that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to make the argument under State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am by Phil Dixon
The district court dismissed the case twice before this appeal and the Fourth Circuit reversed each time. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
*The producer asked me who represented James Ramseur, one of the four. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Ramseur, 374 N.C. 658 (2020), the state supreme court ruled that “applying the repeal retroactively violates the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws. [read post]