Search for: "Apple, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
Plaintiff, Mia Mason, filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendant, Machine Zone Inc., a mobile video game developer. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
With Dropbox the case filed Superior Court, San Francisco County, No. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court * Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. [read post]
Expansion of Class Allows Second Removal Under Class Action Fairness Act, According to Ninth Circuit
21 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
It explained that “Of course, defendants are not entitled to more than one bite at the apple, but the superior court’s certification order substituted a new apple. . . . [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Cf. the old Jake Baker case. * Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
Apple Inc., Judge Ronald S. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:04 am
The case of Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:06 pm
BC-536316, was just filed on February 14, 2014, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
Superior Court (“Platter”). 220 Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
Belden Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm
Shortly after the start of the Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Apple, Inc., where the U.S. [read post]
