Search for: "Application of Markham" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 4:20 am by Russell Knight
An application for waiver of court fees must first be filed using this form “An Application for Waiver of Court Fees in a civil action pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/5-105 shall be in writing and signed by the applicant or, if the applicant is a minor or an incompetent adult, by another person having knowledge of the facts.(1) The contents of the Application must be sufficient to allow a court to determine whether an applicant qualifies for… [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
As the lawsuit was filed after the applicable state’s one-year limitation, the defendant moved to dismiss, which was granted by the trial court. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Doe further claimed that the defendant residential care facility, Roe Facility, chose not to follow the applicable regulations for its admission and retention of the roommate. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
(Markham: LexisNexis Canada, 2014) at 470, Canadian courts are “rightly cautious of attaching too much significance to a single punctuation mark”. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
He states “that the Equustek ruling facilitated an expanded national approach to global internet governance issues, with the likelihood of Canadian courts relying on the decision to expand the applicability of domestic law beyond Canada’s borders. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Jeff Welty
I should note that when I started examining this question, I did what any thinking person would do: I consulted my colleague Jamie Markham, the School of Government’s expert on sentencing and corrections. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 2:46 pm by familoo
' Hannah Markham QC and I were allocated to the 'pro' side of the debate, and HHJ Lazarus and Debbie Singleton to the anti. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Omar cited in this same paragraph, but the rationale is equally applicable. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:23 am by Stewart Baker
In this guestless episode, Michael Vatis, Markham Erickson, and Nick Weaver join me to round up the news. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:54 pm by Stewart Baker
In this guestless episode, Michael Vatis, Markham Erickson, and Nick Weaver join me to explore the intense jockeying that led to passage of S. 139 and gave section 702 of FISA a new lease on life. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court’s order of dismissal was vacated and the case was remanded to the lower court with directions to remand it to the state court from which it was removed (Markham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
On 15 June 2017, there was an application in the appeal of Economou v Freitas. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R v Markham and Edwards ([2017] EWCA Crim 739) the Court of Appeal upheld the order of Haddon-Cave J permitting the press to name Kim Edwards and Lucas Markham, 15 year olds, who were convicted of the murder of Ms Edwards’ mother and sister. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Nursing homes continue to push for application of arbitration rather than lawsuits in Illinois courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” Additionally, under section 15(1)(c) and (d), external and in-house counsel are excluded from acting as whistleblowers if they have obtained information in connection with providing legal services to, or conducting the legal representation of, the subject of the whistleblower submission, unless disclosure of that information would otherwise be permitted by a lawyer under applicable provincial or territorial barreau or law society rules. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
According to the court: In Teresa Scassa, Canadian Trademark Law, 1st ed (Markham: LexisNexis Canada, 2010) at 408 the author wrote: … Where a user who is deliberately searching for the plaintiff’s wares or services is led to the defendant’s site instead, this is called initial interest confusion. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:48 am by Andrew Bainham, St Philips
The Supreme Court disagreed and has in essence held that Re T has equal application to appeals. [read post]