Search for: "Application of Robert M. Cole"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Paul M. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
In 2013, a draft on procedural and evidentiary principles applicable to the sexual assault provisions (¶ 213 of the Model Penal Code) and on collateral consequences of conviction was presented to ALI for discussion but no vote. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Paul M. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:11 pm
You better believe it.Three of the most distinguished and experienced members of the Senate, Chuck Grassley, John Cornyn and Jeff Sessions, today wrote an all-colleagues letter explaining why the Smarter Sentencing Act should be defeated.I'm a biased audience, but I found the letter powerful and convincing. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Paul M. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Paul M. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Paul M. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Paul M. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
Paul M. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
Cole and Frederick P. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
Office:7-11 Legion Drive, Suite M-1C Valhalla, NY 10595-2052 Mailing address: P.O. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:36 am
Paul M. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Not even the employers or the government think the application of Title VII has been–or should have been–static. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
Our first strong impression on that subject, that I'm aware of, anyway, comes in a case described by B.W. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Now I’m not suggesting that Judge Carter, or Jack Greenberg, or the Legal Defense Fund sue the Court for trademark infringement. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
Roberts and D.P. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
Panera Bread Company, January 5, 2018, Arnold, M.). [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
I’m referring to the comment [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
Two (Docket #s 15-1023 and 15-5020) involve different challenges to Judge Roberts’s December 29 ruling abstaining from entertaining Nashiri’s pre-trial challenge to his military commission trial (a ruling I’ve critiqued here previously). [read post]
