Search for: "Application of Terminal Transportation, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2008, 4:59 pm
  In approving the judge's application of adverse inferences, Chairman Schaumber distinguished the instant case from McAllister Towing & Transportation Co., 341 NLRB 394 (2004), a case in which he dissented in relevant part. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm by Law Lady
Arbitration & Mediation, Class Action, Consumer Law This case involved arbitration proceedings stemming from plaintiff's class action suit alleging, among other things, that SouthernLINC's termination fees were unlawful penalties under Georgia law. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Epic Logistics, Inc.: This is a dispute between competing third party logistics companies in the transportation industry including claims involving trade secrets, joint venture, tortious interference with contract by hiring an employee subject to non-compete, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Plan’s application was made and approved under the interim rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
He found that TAPS is not a "public utility" under Board law, and thus the systemwide unit presumption is not applicable. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
Brown & Root, Inc., 923 F.2d 1150 (5th Cir. 1991), and not any doctrines of law from the applicable state. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Ruth Levush
In my August post, Legal Aspects of Unmanned Systems – Part 1: Civilian Uses, I highlighted legal concerns associated with the application of unmanned systems in civilian settings, including the potential impact of their use on safety, security, privacy, and property rights, as well as the possible application of criminal laws regarding their use. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am by Jim Shore
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Michigan federal district court ruled that an employee who was terminated by Wal-Mart after testing positive for validly obtained medical marijuana stated no legal claims for wrongful discharge. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:25 am by Gabrielle Rollin
La sanction prédéterminée à la convention collective ne permet pas de se soustraire à l’application de la législation sur les droits de la personne. [read post]