Search for: "Applied Materials v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Steven Boutwell
Introduction to Punitive Damages Pecuniary damages are awards designed to restore “material loss which is susceptible of pecuniary valuation. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 2:23 am
Petitioner moved to add the Board as respondent to his appeal at the circuit court. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:18 am by Ron Miller
In Rieve v Coventry Health Care, Inc, a registered nurse who served as a field case manager (FSM) for a company that helped employers control workerscompensation costs was found to be exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
A special panel of the Workman’s Compensation Board reviewed the matter and agreed with the Referee’s judgement and affirmed the compensation award. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
("NOW") appeals the order of the Unemployment Insurance Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development ("the Board") that determined that Tommy C. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
The plaintiffs were all eligible to receive workers’ comp benefits through the Office of WorkersCompensation. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm by Law Lady
Although the insurer contended that it was entitled to a credit for the workers' compensation benefits that were never repaid out of pocket, the insured became obligated to reimburse the workers' compensation carrier upon recovering from the tortfeasor, and the insured's settlement with the workers' compensation carrier was the equivalent of repayment of the benefits. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm by Rob
Workers Compensation Appeals Board (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1288) Other points to remember in determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor are that the existence of a written agreement purporting to establish an independent contractor relationship is not determinative (Borello, Id.at 349), and the fact that a worker is issued a 1099 form rather than a W-2 form is also not determinative with respect to independent… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court refused summary judgment to the plaintiffs as well because the facts related to the process used by the government to prepare its current proposed policy—and especially how independent that process was—were disputed material facts affecting the degree of deference owed by the court to the government’s policy decisions, and the level of scrutiny to apply to the challenged policy. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
The district court granted petitioner's petition and issued a preliminary injunction, applying the test established in Winter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In 2009, the plaintiffs filed an action against the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice three years later in light of the Supreme Court's decision in "Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. [read post]