Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 21 - 40 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Ct. 616 (2016) to Death-Sentenced Prisoners on Collateral Review Abstract:      In Apprendi v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 11:11 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to... [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question in this case was whether the imposition of criminal fines is subject to the Sixth Amendment principle articulated in Apprendi v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:16 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), overturned the repeated holding of the Supreme Court, see, e.g., Rose v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether the imposition of criminal fines is subject to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles articulated in Apprendi v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
New Jersey (2000), which held that a jury, and not a judge, must find the facts that increase a statutory maximum prison term.  [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Apprendi v New Jersey, the Court held that a State could not avoid the reasonable doubt standard by shifting elements of a criminal offense to the sentencing phase. ...Last year, I blogged about a United States Supreme Court rolling called Alleyne v United States, 570 US ___; 133 S Ct 2151; 186 L Ed 2d 314 (2013), which I thought was the last nail in this flawed argument’s “coffin. [read post]