Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 41 - 60 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) and are not facts that a jury must find under Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm by Luke Rioux
New Jersey and held that facts which increase the maximum sentence must be submitted to the jury for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by Susan F. Mandiberg
New Jersey: “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”  [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
Liptak points to Justice Breyer’s dissent in Apprendi v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
First, the prior cases in a nutshell, [Apprendi]invalidated New Jersey’s hate-crime statute, which gave judges the power to make the specific factual findings that converted an ordinary crime into a hate crime, with an enhanced sentence. [read post]