Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 61 - 80 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, the state legislature amended the scheme to provide that the choice of sentences at the upper, middle, or lower terms was within the judge's discretion. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), which applies to mandatory minimums under Alleyne, are waived when the defendant pleads guilty. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
New Jersey, and “must be found by a jury, not a judge,” Cunningham v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Apprendi v New Jersey, the Court held that a State could not avoid the reasonable doubt standard by shifting elements of a criminal offense to the sentencing phase. ...Last year, I blogged about a United States Supreme Court rolling called Alleyne v United States, 570 US ___; 133 S Ct 2151; 186 L Ed 2d 314 (2013), which I thought was the last nail in this flawed argument’s “coffin. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
New Jersey's supposedly originalist reading of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm by Luke Rioux
New Jersey and held that facts which increase the maximum sentence must be submitted to the jury for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]