Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 81 - 100
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
New Jersey's supposedly originalist reading of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
This was the insight of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:20 am
In Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
New Jersey and held that facts which increase the maximum sentence must be submitted to the jury for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
New Jersey. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
The new decision in Alleyne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm
Since its Apprendi v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:33 am
It has been settled since the Court’s 1996 decision in Apprendi v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:37 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
In 2000, the Supreme Court decided Apprendi v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm
New Jersey, any fact (except a prior conviction) that enhances a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, must be either admitted by the defendant or proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the satisfaction of a jury. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); Texas v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
New Jersey, holding that facts increasing the defendant’s statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
Since the Court’s decision in 2000 in Apprendi v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 10:13 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
New Jersey, requiring juries — not judges — to find facts to support enhancing a criminal sentence 11-9953 — Boyer v. [read post]
