Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 121 - 140
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
Apprendi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
New Jersey which entitles defendants to a jury trial on sentencing factors that increase the maximum sentence. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)), and/or the mandatory minimums (implicating Harris v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Apprendi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:49 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), line of cases to reach that result. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), undermine the Supreme Court's ruling in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Apprendi v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:35 am
New Jersey, and Ring v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:19 am
In the 2000 case that got the series started, Apprendi v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
The district court believed it was entitled to do this pursuant to Apprendi v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:25 am
Arizona.In the 2000 case of Apprendi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the sentencing judge determined the applicable drug quantities (and thereby the statutory maximum and minimum penalty and the guideline range) whether a conviction was by a jury or by a guilty plea. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on… [read post]
