Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 121 - 140
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
New Jersey: “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
New Jersey applies to the imposition of criminal fines. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
(4) Whether the District Court violated Apprendi v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)), 2011 U. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:00 pm
Southern Union filed a petition for a writ of certiorari - arguing that Sixth Amendment principles as interpreted in Apprendi v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),... [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
New Jersey, which held that federal juries, rather than judges, must decide any facts leading to enhanced criminal penalties. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
New Jersey [opinion] and its progeny apply to the imposition of criminal fines. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:28 am
New Jersey. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:38 pm
New Jersey, the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am
Liptak points to Justice Breyer’s dissent in Apprendi v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm
Ring announced that the rule of Apprendi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:27 am
New Jersey and United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am
Issues S-10-229: Whether the rule of Apprendi v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
After the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Apprendi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]