Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 141 - 160 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); Texas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
New Jersey in 2000 SCOTUS issued a string of decisions saying, in essence, that judges can't make factual findings that increase sentences; only juries can do that. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, the state legislature amended the scheme to provide that the choice of sentences at the upper, middle, or lower terms was within the judge's discretion. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:33 am
New Jersey line of sentencing cases to allow harsher sentences based upon facts found by a judge, not by the jury. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Ring v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Since the Court’s decision in 2000 in Apprendi v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
One lonely new hold: Coleman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am by WSLL
Issues S-10-229: Whether the rule of Apprendi v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
New Jersey's supposedly originalist reading of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Lyle Denniston
New Jersey, requiring juries — not judges — to find facts to support enhancing a criminal sentence 11-9953 — Boyer v. [read post]