Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 161 - 180 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am by MBettman
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 7:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the panel found the reasoning persuasive. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:54 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
    This appeal concerns the constitutionality of a provision of New Jersey's hate crime laws that allows enhanced sentencing in any case in which a defendant who commits a crime acts with a biased purpose. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 6:34 am by David Oscar Markus
New Jersey, on Friday it set the stage for another — tied directly to the Apprendi precedent.  [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
New Jersey, and “must be found by a jury, not a judge,” Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 8:04 am
New Jersey, a case that "revolutionized sentencing laws. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 7:13 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
New Jersey, which prohibits sentencing schemes that allowed judges to make factual findings altering the range of punishment, would no longer apply against the states [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:03 am
New Jersey in 2000 limiting judges' power to impose enhanced sentences. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm by Jeff Gamso
New Jersey, any fact (except a prior conviction) that enhances a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, must be either admitted by the defendant or proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the satisfaction of a jury. [read post]