Search for: "Archdiocese of Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Catholic Archdiocese yesterday filed suit in federal district court against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority after WMATA rejected ads designed to be placed on the exterior of buses promoting the Archdiocese's "Find the Perfect Gift" Campaign. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm by Howard Friedman
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (D DC, Dec. 8, 2017), the DC federal district court upheld advertising Guidelines of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority which, among other things, bar transit vehicle ads "that promote or oppose any religion, religious practice or belief. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., Dec. 20, 2017), the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., July 31, 2018), the D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:42 am by Aurora Barnes
Archdiocese of Washington v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Yet a D.C. district court has upheld a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority exclusion that was nearly identical to the one struck down in Rosenberger. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
There, Archdiocese officials have sued the Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (or Metro) over the Metro’s decision to not display Archdiocese advertising on public transportation. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am by Amy Howe
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am by John Elwood
And in Archdiocese of Washington v. [read post]