Search for: "Arden v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:41 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
The appellant made fresh submissions to the Secretary of State in 2011, claiming that she had been working in a nail bar. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
It was about “the measures which the Secretary of State has put in place to discharge the responsibility of determining how to resolve the issue of discrimination to which the bar gives rise” (per Arden LJ at [98]). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Meanwhile, in a short Judgment, Arden LJ finds the same result, but based simply, she states, on the basis of statutory interpretation: […]the true interpretation of schedule 6 of the LRA and section 144 of LASPOA, it is the intention of Parliament that an application for registration of adverse possession should not be barred by reliance on acts in contravention of section 144 of LASPOA. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The appeal in the Mirror Phone Hacking damages case is due to be heard by Arden, Rafferty and Kitchin LJJ in the Court of Appeal on Tuesday and Wednesday, 20 and 21 October 2015. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Court of Appeals in New Orleans (2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,968), barring price fixing claims against title insurers under the federal “filed rate” doctrine.The home purchasers—alleging a conspiracy to fix the price of title insurance—questioned (1) whether the federal "filed rate" doctrine bars Texas state antitrust and state unfair practices claims where Texas law expressly forbids these practices and (2) whether a federal… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
“Owner” or BusinessRelying on Redevelopment Agency v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
(CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,982); and U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says Parliament may be prorogued for a number of purposes. 14:26: Lord Reed and Lady Arden question Lord Keen QC regarding procedural steps the Government would take in the event that prorogation is declared unlawful by the Court. 14:21: Lord Keen QC submits that “in any view” part 4 of the Interlocuter (the Inner Court’s order) must be recalled. 14:19 Lord Keen QC argues that in so far as the Inner House sought to declare the prorogation unlawful, he will take no issue… [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the decision of Arden LJ in Giles v Rhind, the Court of Appeal determined that ‘breach of duty’ is applicable to any legal wrongdoing. [read post]
