Search for: "Arden v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It is important for us to speak directly to not just the securities bar, but also to everyone that is interested in our work. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the decision of Arden LJ in Giles v Rhind, the Court of Appeal determined that ‘breach of duty’ is applicable to any legal wrongdoing. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
The appellant made fresh submissions to the Secretary of State in 2011, claiming that she had been working in a nail bar. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says Parliament may be prorogued for a number of purposes. 14:26: Lord Reed and Lady Arden question Lord Keen QC regarding procedural steps the Government would take in the event that prorogation is declared unlawful by the Court. 14:21: Lord Keen QC submits that “in any view” part 4 of the Interlocuter (the Inner Court’s order) must be recalled. 14:19 Lord Keen QC argues that in so far as the Inner House sought to declare the prorogation unlawful, he will take no issue… [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
It was about “the measures which the Secretary of State has put in place to discharge the responsibility of determining how to resolve the issue of discrimination to which the bar gives rise” (per Arden LJ at [98]). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm
(It is also worth mentioning that the Bar Pro Bono Unit arranged for some pro bono advice and representation by Robert Brown of Arden Chambers. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The appeal in the Mirror Phone Hacking damages case is due to be heard by Arden, Rafferty and Kitchin LJJ in the Court of Appeal on Tuesday and Wednesday, 20 and 21 October 2015. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Clayton Arden v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Meanwhile, in a short Judgment, Arden LJ finds the same result, but based simply, she states, on the basis of statutory interpretation: […]the true interpretation of schedule 6 of the LRA and section 144 of LASPOA, it is the intention of Parliament that an application for registration of adverse possession should not be barred by reliance on acts in contravention of section 144 of LASPOA. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
National Martini Day (courtesy Bar Louie) June 19 was “World Martini Day. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
