Search for: "Aren Sharifi" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
No-Action Letter for Eli Lilly & Co. Permitted Exclusion of Proposal to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirements
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
For additional information on the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for Qualcomm Permitted Exclusion of Proposal to Allow Simple Majority Vote
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am by Audrey Johnson
For additional information on the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for Equinix, Inc. Allowed Exclusion of Proxy Access Bylaw
19 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by John Ikard
For a more detailed discussion of this exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, RULE 14A-8(I)(10): HOW SUBSTANTIAL IS “SUBSTANTIALLY” IMPLEMENTED IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL POLICY PROPOSALS?. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/
No-Action Letter for Kewaunee Science Corporation. Allowed Exclusion of Proposal to Eliminate Directors’ Insurance Benefits
19 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Donovan Gibbons
For additional discussion of the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for The Cato Corp. Permitted Exclusion of Shareholder Proposal Explicitly Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
4 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Kevin Watson
For additional discussion of the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for Pfizer Inc. Permitted Exclusion of Shareholder Proposal Seeking Report on the Risks from Raising Drug Prices
25 Apr 2018, 12:00 am by Sydney Boyle
For additional discussion of the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No Action Letter for ITT Inc. Permitting Exclusion of Shareholder Proposal
6 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Sean Cuff
  For additional discussion of the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10); How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for Microsoft, Corp. Prevents Exclusion of Proxy Access Bylaw Proposal
8 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Ken Monington
  For a more detailed discussion of this exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(i)(10):  How Substantial Is “Substantially” Implemented in the Context of the Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/
No-Action Letter for Apple Inc. Permitted Exclusion of Policy to Keep Doors closed when Climate Control in Use.
9 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Carlos Schidlow
For additional discussion of the exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(I)(10): How Substantial is “Substantially” Implemented in The Context of Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
No-Action Letter for The Walt Disney Co. Did Not Permit Exclusion of "Proxy Access" Bylaw Amendment Proposal
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Sophie Fritz
For a more detailed discussion of this exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(i)(10):  How Substantial Is “Substantially” Implemented in the Context of the Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/
No-Action Letter for The Walt Disney Co. Did Not Permit Exclusion of "Proxy Access" Bylaw Amendment Proposal
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Allison Takacs
For a more detailed discussion of this exclusion, see Aren Sharifi, Rule 14a-8(i)(10):  How Substantial Is “Substantially” Implemented in the Context of the Social Policy Proposals? [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/