Search for: "Arenas v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am by slemberg
ARS National Services, Inc., 09-CV—780 JAH in United States District Court of California. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 10:50 am by Ezra Rosser
Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited “right to take access” to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
 The United States Supreme Court has held that certain categories of speech do not receive constitutional protection. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
 Yet, the applicability of this presumption across courts in the United States is an open question in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
From this jurisdictional baseline, tribes, states and the United States should cooperate to ensure that a given regulatory regime protects water quality and access to water. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
However in this arena each state has the right to determine the rules about when a judgment from one court is binding on another court. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm by Ken Lammers
These things can be written about by every other citizen in the United States, just not Horace. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The reason the law is weak in this arena is that the United States remains the only country in the world not to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited “right to take access” to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
In one of their briefs to the Supreme Court (here), the district argues that, among other reasons, the election of Barack Obama shows that the United States political arena has changed drastically from the one that existed when the VRA was passed in 1965. [read post]