Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 201 - 220
of 413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and involves the right to challenge the conciliation proceedings of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in employment discrimination matters. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:57 am
And writing at the Arizona DUI Defense Blog, Lawrence discussed how tiny errors can have huge consequences in DUI cases, because of the way that blood is tested and the results are generated. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
All of the targeted Arizona firms are listed at the bottom, as is the case name and caption number. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:37 am
From the States and Municipalities: Arizona – Ariz. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Advice to Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson: There is Arizona’s former Gov. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Ricci began having employment problems, which he believes was retaliation by Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
In the event of an extenuating situation there still could be liability placed on the employer to cover the claim. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:33 am
Undocumented workers are not precluded from recovering liquidated damages under the FLSA, ruled a federal district court in Arizona. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
The court also rejected the argument that labor and trade relations between the US and Mexico would be jeopardized by the enforcement of Arizona's laws for injured workers against a foreign employer.A rehearing petition to the appellate court was rejected and the Arizona Supreme Court likewise refused to hear the case.Porteadores argues that the Foreign Commerce Clause of the US Constitution should require individual states to recognize and honor the workers' compensation… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm
” According to the State, the only case “in American legal history” which had ever suggested that pension rights were outside the scope of the police power was the 2014 opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court, Fields v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:25 pm
The other five cases are from Florida,Texas, Arizona, Washington and Georgia. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:23 am
Doyle, a founding partner of the Doyle Raizner law firm, which filed both complaints, told WorkCompCentral the Arizona case already survived a motion to dismiss and he anticipates going to trial by the middle of summer. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Both the state of Arizona and the employee sued ASARCO; the cases were consolidated, and a federal jury found the employer liable for sexual harassment but not retaliation or constructive discharge. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
§ 1346(b)) waives sovereign immunity for personal-injury and negligence claims arising from the conduct of federal employees acting within the scope of their office or employment, giving district courts jurisdiction over claims against the United States and rendering the U.S. subject to suit and liability to the same extent a private person would be liable under state law. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008), . . . in which the court ruled on the application of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] to conduct similar to that at issue in this case. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:46 am
But the Arizona court found that since the officer was only on the scene because of his employment, any injury he sustained, even if it occurred while going above-and-beyond the call of duty, was covered by the assumption of risk. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
In addition to the threat of significant liability, employers are plagued with a certain level of uncertainty given that this area of law is rapidly developing and new issues emerge as courts address new FCRA cases. [read post]
