Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 201 - 220 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 7:37 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: Arizona – Ariz. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Advice to Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson: There is Arizona’s former Gov. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Ricci began having employment problems, which he believes was retaliation by Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
      In the event of an extenuating situation there still could be liability placed on the employer to cover the claim. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm by Kirk Jenkins
”  According to the State, the only case “in American legal history” which had ever suggested that pension rights were outside the scope of the police power was the 2014 opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court, Fields v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:25 pm by Jon Gelman
The other five cases are from Florida,Texas, Arizona, Washington and Georgia. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm by Howard Wasserman
§ 1346(b)) waives sovereign immunity for personal-injury and negligence claims arising from the conduct of federal employees acting within the scope of their office or employment, giving district courts jurisdiction over claims against the United States and rendering the U.S. subject to suit and liability to the same extent a private person would be liable under state law. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008), . . . in which the court ruled on the application of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] to conduct similar to that at issue in this case. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:46 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
But the Arizona court found that since the officer was only on the scene because of his employment, any injury he sustained, even if it occurred while going above-and-beyond the call of duty, was covered by the assumption of risk. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Deleon 13-1516Issue: Whether it is an “adverse employment action” for a discrimination claim, or a “materially adverse action” for a retaliation claim, when an employer grants an employee's request for a job transfer. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
“Whether in the international oil industry, as in this case, or a local family-run restaurant, the Labor Department is working to ensure that responsible employers do not experience a competitive disadvantage because they play by the rules. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:54 pm by Ohio Employment Law Letter
” In a “sex-plus” case, like this one, in which the court finds the employee established a sufficient foundation of discrimination, the employer is not permitted to “undermine her prima facie case by showing that white women and African[-]American men received the same treatment. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The EPL coverage part of the management liability insurance policy defined “Wrongful Employment Practices” to include “wrongful failure or refusal to adopt or enforce adequate workplace or employment practices, policies or procedures. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Greg Mersol
  An Arizona district court has now granted summary judgment in favor of at least one of the putative employers on similar claims involving very different evidence. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Jay Yurkiw
” The court analyzed a handful of cases addressing these issues, including the January decision in In Re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-md-2299 (W.D. [read post]