Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 61 - 80 of 328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel found that plaintiffs properly pled a cause of action for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct under both Arizona and Texas law and loss of child consortium under Arizona law and thus the case was remanded back for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Misclassification of workers providing services as non-employees increasingly causes U.S. businesses to incur unanticipated FLSA and other wage and hour law liability for back pay, liquidated punitive damages, civil monetary penalties and other liability, in part because of WHD’s stepped up worker education, scrutiny, investigation, and enforcement challenging employers’ treatment of workers as non-employees. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Legal Background in Mount Lemmon Fire District v Guido The key issue in the case was whether the ADEA exempts political subdivisions of a state with less than 20 employees. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
She subsequently sued, alleging she was wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against in violation of the AMMA, the Arizona Civil Rights Act (ACRA), the Arizona Employment Protection Act (AEPA), and the Arizona workers’ compensation statutes. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
So, the case that might get most attention is Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:08 pm by Lou M
Rizo received a 5% bump up from her $50,000 salary in Arizona, and then was placed on Step One of the hiring schedule. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:45 pm by Hirsch & Lyon Accident Law
When litigating a claim against a commercial truck driver — and thanks to the application of vicarious liability principles, their employer — you may find that establishing negligence is somewhat “easier” to do than litigating a claim against a non-commercial driver. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:44 am by Lawrence Solum
The proposal is derived from employer-employee respondeat superior liability principles in employment law, particularly in the Title VII sexual harassment context. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
In addition to the threat of significant liability, employers are plagued with a certain level of uncertainty given that this area of law is rapidly developing and new issues emerge as courts address new FCRA cases. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The endangered species case grows out of a move by the state of Arizona to take over from EPA the program of regulating permits for discharge of pollutants under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
(Sotomayor, J., recused)   March (5) Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 11:05 am by Renae Lloyd
Investigating Potential Claims The White Law Group is investigating the liability that Bradley Tennison’s employers may have for failing to properly supervising him. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In this case, involving employees of a California-based corporation and solely limited to the issue of payment of daily and weekly overtime, the Court found Arizona and Colorado's interests to be minimal. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for August, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]