Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 101 - 120 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Candelaria, involving Arizona's authority to enact a law governing the employment of illegal aliens; Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In this case, involving employees of a California-based corporation and solely limited to the issue of payment of daily and weekly overtime, the Court found Arizona and Colorado's interests to be minimal. [read post]
In many instances, multiple laws will apply at once; thus, these laws do not exist in a vacuum, and retail employers must be prepared to manage all of them at once to avoid compliance issues and resulting liability. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In some states, such as California, violations of these rules can lead to draconian fines and present significant liability for unwary employers. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am by Tammy Binford
James, an editor of Arizona Employment Law Letter and attorney with Gonzalez Law, LLC, in Tempe, Arizona. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:35 am by Dan Farber
This is a challenge to an Arizona immigration law which requires that employers check the immigration status of job applicants and penalizes companies that hire undocumented aliens. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
McBride (Granted )Docket: 10-235Issue(s): Whether the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Amy Howe
The justices turned down Arizona’s request to be able to file an original action – that is a complaint in the Supreme Court – against California, challenging the constitutionality of California’s application of a tax to Arizona limited-liability corporations that invest in California corporations. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 8:40 am by Mark Tabakman
Copperstate Farms LLC and was filed in federal court in the District of Arizona. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
”   The US Supreme Court was a good bit more active, coming down with the decision in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Restatement Third §2 would be a significant revision of Alaska law - sort of like what just happened in South Carolina.ArizonaLower Arizona courts have followed the Restatement Third §2 on the rationale that, in general, Arizona law has adopted the principles of the Restatement of Torts. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:21 am by Jessica Mendelson
Battani of the Eastern District of Michigan decided the case of Ajuba International , LLC v. [read post]